Legal Opinion

United States v. Ham

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1951No. 14165_1PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is taken by the United States to reverse a judgment rendered pursuant to jury verdict fixing the amount of compensation for the taking of land in condemnation proceedings instituted under 40 U.S.C.A. § 258a. The appellant asserts errors committed in receiving and in excluding evidence and in the instructions to the jury. It also contends that by reason of the court’s erroneous declarations, rulings, and conduct of the trial, the appellant was denied a fair and impartial jury trial on the issue of the amount of compensation.

The appeal brings up for review…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Baetjer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  4. Welch v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  5. United States v. Becktold Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. 5139.5 Acres of Land, in Aiken and Barnwell Counties, S. C., Tract No. D-308Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  2. Hickey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  3. United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  4. Autoridad de Carreteras y Transportación v. Adquisición de 780.6141 Metros Cuadrados de TerrenoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005
  5. Simmonds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API