Legal Opinion
Simmonds v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 21, 1952No. 12969_1PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
In furtherance of the Sacramento River Improvement Project which is being administered by the Secretary of the Army under the authority of the Act of April 24, 1888, c. 194, 25 Stat. 94, 33 U.S.C.A. § 591, and the River and Harbor Act approved August 30, 1935, c. 831, 49 Stat. 1028, as amended July 24, 1946, c. 595, 60 Stat. 634, the United States has condemned the fee simple title in a parcel of land, designated as Tract No. 7, abutting the Sacramento River almost opposite the City of Sacramento, the capital of the State of California. The land condemned has been used…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Old Dominion Land Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Becktold Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. HamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. J. Cyril Johnson and Ray T. LindsayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Southern California Financial Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Brush Hill Development, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- United States v. 3,317.39 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Jefferson County, Arkansas, and Earl MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Caddy-Imler Creations, Inc. v. John D. CaddyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.