Town of Hodgenville v. Gainesboro Tel. Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Logan
Affirming.
On June 1, 1925, the town of Hodgenville, by ordinance, granted a franchise to the G-ainesboro Telephone Company which authorized it to maintain and operate a system of telephones in the town. Pursuant to the authority thus granted, the telephone company innstalled a system of telephones in the town, and has since been engaged in the business of operating telephones therein.
_ Later the city council of Hodgenville enacted an ordinance providing for an occupation tax which should be imposed upon persons, firms, and corporations engaged in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Princeton v. Princeton Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Gathright v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Louisville Home Telephone Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Cum. Telep. & Teleg. Co. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Bates v. City of MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Bowling Green v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
- Union Light, Heat & Power Co. v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- City of Ashland v. FanninCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Ralston v. City of MiddlesboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952