CMG Worldwide, Inc. v. Glaser
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS
RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief Judge.'
On January 9, 2015, the court dismissed Plaintiff CMG Worldwide, Inc.’s, Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Count III alleged Defendants violated Section 10(b) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Securities Act”) and Rule 10b-5; and Count IV alleged Defendants violated Section 20(a) of the Act. Having finally adjudicated this action, the court is now required, pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”), to make “specific findings regarding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scott v. Vantage CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021