Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1987No. 20746PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Defendant Richard Lynn Wright appeals from a decision convicting him of two counts of aggravated robbery. Defendant challenges his conviction, arguing that (1) he was not given a speedy trial, (2) the statute of limitations had run, (3) the county attorney did not comply with Utah Code Ann. § 77-29-1(1) (1953) by prosecuting defendant within the 120-day period set forth in that statute, and (4) the trial court improperly admitted a confession made by defendant to Canadian police officers. We find no error.

On September 8, 1976, a man driving an orange Corvette owned by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. State v. HalesUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  5. State v. StillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API