Legal Opinion

State v. Stillings

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1989No. 88-609PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

Defendant Michael Duane Stillings appeals his conviction by the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, for committing perjury by making two, inconsistent, material statements under oath in an official proceeding in violation of § 45-7-201(6), MCA (1987). We affirm.

The defendant raises the following issues on appeal. Did the District Court err in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the information when the District Court found that either:

1) the defendant’s act of perjury under § 45-7-201(6), MCA (1987), was not complete, and therefore the statute of limitations…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Traxler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. State v. PerryMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. AnsellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. State v. HouckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. The People v. CarmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DuBrayMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. McIntireMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People v. ButlerColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. People v. McIntireMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API