Legal Opinion

Bentley v. Zensano, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 26, 2006No. 1 CA-CV 05-0196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Judge.

¶ 1 Numerous individuals (collectively “the plaintiffs”) have appealed the superior court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice their complaints against Zensano, Inc., and Zen-gen, Inc. (collectively “the defendants”).1 The court ruled that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants and that the plaintiffs had failed to state a claim for relief against the defendants. For the reasons discussed below, we agree with the court that it was without jurisdiction, and we therefore affirm the judgment without addressing the merits of the second contention.

*89 BACKGROUND

¶ 2…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. A. UBERTI & C. v. Leonardo in & for PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Batton v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Desarrollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo, S.A. De C v. v. Kader Holdings Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Sigmund v. ReaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Arab v. SarkisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company LimitedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. In re Marriage of PeckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API