Legal Opinion

Holland v. Hurley

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 19, 2009No. 2 CA-CV 2008-0126PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 This case presents a personal-jurisdiction issue of first impression in Arizona arising from plaintiff/appellant Jimmie Holland’s Internet purchase of a used automobile through the online auction site eBay. The trial court dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction Holland’s action for damages *555against the out-of-state eBay seller, defendant/appellee Michael Hurley. Holland challenges that ruling and also argues the court abused its discretion by refusing to stay its ruling on Hurley’s motion to dismiss to give Holland an opportunity to conduct discovery…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holland v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API