Legal Opinion

Hess v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 29, 1921No. 10435PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; W. B. Taylor, Judge. Action by the State of Oklahoma for the forfeiture of property; Addie Hess and others, claimants and interveners. Judgment of forfeiture. Claimants and inter-veners appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKennameb, J.

This appeal is prosecuted by Addie Hess, White Sewing Machine Company, a corporation, Phonograph Shop, ‘Sigmund Mayer, and Bobert Ball, as plaintiffs in error, to reverse a judgment .of forfeiture entered in the county court of Oklahoma county, Oklahoma, on the 21st day of June, 1918, decreeing the forfeiture of furniture >and fixtures used in a rooming house at 220% and 222% North Broadway, Oklahoma City, to the state of Oklahoma, defendant in error.

The record discloses that on or about May 20, 1918, Wade Spears, a police officer of Oklahoma City, went to this rooming house witho-ut a search…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Youman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Turner v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Brumfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Tomlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API