Legal Opinion
Trihy v. Belsha
Suffolk County District Court
Decided November 30, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtErnest L. Signorelli, J.
The plaintiffs, doing business as Trihy Construction & Realty Co., are real estate brokers, and bring this action to recover real estate commissions as against the sellers, Harry R. Belsha and Marian E. Belsha, which they claim are due and owing after having procured the purchasers, G-ino Costa and Filomena Costa who, presumably, were ready, willing and able to purchase the sellers’ house, and did in fact close title thereon.
The sellers have impleaded the purchasers, and in their third-party complaint are seeking to recover as against the purchasers for any sum the broker may recover in this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Lloyd v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Muldoon v. SilvestreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- McEvoy v. Athens Hotel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1923
- Herka Realty Co. v. La Salle Military AcademyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Argo Marine Systems, Inc. v. Camar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Oscar Mayer Corp. v. Mincing Trading Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Argo Marine Systems, Inc. v. Camar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985