Legal Opinion

Argo Marine Systems, Inc. v. Camar Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 19, 1985No. 341, Docket 84-7563PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1008CLARIE, District Judge:

In the trial court, the plaintiff-appellant, Argo Marine Systems, Inc. (hereinafter “Argo”), sought compensation from the defendant-appellee, Camar Corporation (hereinafter “Camar”), in the form of orally agreed upon commissions represented to be due to the plaintiff as the result of its being appointed as a sales agent for the defendant. Argo claims to have marketed or contributed to the procurement of sales of Camar’s inert gas system (hereinafter “IGS”), invented and manufactured by Ca-mar; or, in the alternative, that Camar agreed, orally, to compensate it for sales…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Greene v. HellmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Argo Marine Systems, Inc. v. Camar Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  5. Trihy v. BelshaSuffolk County District Court · 1966

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Daval Steel Products v. M/V FakredineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Coghlan v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. Coghlan v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Fishbein v. MirandaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. Thomas E. Hoar, Incorporated, Cross-Appellee v. Sara Lee Corporation, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API