Legal Opinion
Oscar Mayer Corp. v. Mincing Trading Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 27, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-3469PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
Third-party defendant A.A. Sayia & Co., Inc. (“Sayia”) moves for summary judgment asserting that no genuine issues of material fact exist and Sayia is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Third-party plaintiffs Mincing Trading Corp. and Mincing Overseas Spice Co., Inc. (collectively “Mincing”) and third-party defendant Da-arnhouwer (New York), Inc. (“Daarnhou-wer”) allege that fact issues remain which preclude the entry of summary judgment. The Court has reviewed all the submissions of the parties. For the reasons which follow, the Court finds that no genuine…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Newmark v. Gimbel's IncorporatedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Waterson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ebenhoech v. Koppers Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Agurto v. GuhrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Sedbrook v. Zimmerman Design Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Straley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- In Re Alcom America Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.