Legal Opinion
United States v. Macleod Bureau
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 27, 1947No. 17512PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALEY, District Judge.
Two motions to dismiss the indictment and eight motions for bills of particulars have been filed by the various defendants in the above entitled action.
The motions for particulars will be considered and disposed of in the following order:
The joint motion of IS defendants—to wit:
1— Macleod Bureau; Burton-Furber Coal Company; C. H. Sprague & Son Company; Glendale Coal Company; H. N. Hartwell & Son, Inc.; Massachusetts Wharf Coal Company; Metropolitan Coal Company; New England Coal & Coke Company; Pocahontas Fuel Company, Inc.; Staples Coal Company; White Fuel Corporation;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- United States v. General Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- United States v. Allied Chemical & Dye CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HicksTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. HsiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- United States v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959