United States v. General Electric Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Two motions have been made by the defendants (excepting Krupp, which has not been served); (1) to quash Count Two of the indictment or, in the alternative, to compel the government to elect between Counts One and Two; and (2) for a bill of particulars.
The indictment contains three counts, but the third (a violation of the Wilson Tariff Act) is not directly involved on this motion. Counts One and Two charge a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman AntiTrust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1, from which I quote as follows: “§ 1. Every contract, combination in the form of trust or…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. American Honda Motor CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- United States v. Greater Kansas City Retail Coal Merchants' Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
- United States v. DrexlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. Greater Syracuse Board of Realtors, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.