J-M Manufacturing Co. v. Phillips & Cohen LLP
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
BLUMENFELD, J.,*
Dissenting.—Alter strenuously, repeatedly, and successfully arguing at trial that the case was not about the quality of the pipes sold by J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. (J-M), and after obtaining a jury verdict based on its argument that it did not have to prove that a single piece of pipe was faulty, Phillips & Cohen LLP published a press release touting that the jury had found J-M liable “for making and selling faulty water system pipes.” The headline read in full: “[J-M] faces billions in damages after jury finds [J-M] liable for making and selling faulty water system…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reader's Digest Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Carver v. BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Frisk v. MerrihewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Handelsman v. San Francisco ChronicleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Jennings v. Telegram-Tribune Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.