Legal Opinion
Charles Hulme v. Sweetman Construction Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1956No. 5192_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
From the spring of 1951 until the fall of 1952, Hulme was engaged in carrying out a railroad construction contract near Chamberlain, South Dakota, which he had entered into with the Corps of Engineers, United States Army. 1 During the same period, Sweetman Construction Company 2 was engaged in carrying out a similar contract. In order to fulfil his contract, Hulme required a quantity of crushed rock materials, consisting of surface gravel, sub-ballast and ballast. On October 3Í, 1951, Hulme and Sweet-man entered into a written contract, which provided that Sweetman would…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Investors' Utility Corp. v. ChallacombeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- City of Seattle v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- City of New York v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- REA Express v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969