Legal Opinion

Microsoft Corp. v. Pronet Cyber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 9, 2009No. 1:08cv434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.

At issue in this counterfeiting case is whether plaintiff is entitled to partial summary judgment on defendants’ liability pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2318, which makes unlawful knowing trafficking in counterfeit labels in connection with a copy of a computer program. Defendants oppose partial summary judgment solely on the ground that they did not know their conduct was unlawful, and hence they did not “knowingly” traffic in counterfeit labels.

For the reasons that follow, plaintiff is entitled to partial summary judgment. Specifically,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graphic Design Marketing, Inc. v. Xtreme Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011
  2. Mahon v. Mainsail LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API