Legal Opinion

In re Ordinance to Rezone

Marion County Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 1, 1962No. 35747PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

This cause comes on an appeal under the administrative procedure act from a final order, adjudication and decision of the City Council of the City of Marion, Ohio, a Municipal Corporation made and entered on the 11th day of September, 1961 in which it was held and decided that the appellant Russell D. Luke was not entitled to have rezoned from “A” residential to “B” commercial lots number 1703, and 1704 in True’s Fourth Addition to the City of Marion, Ohio and was denied the useage of said property for a gasoline and oil service station.

The same is submitted to the Court on the transcript of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Belden v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Henle v. City of EuclidOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. State, Ex Rel. Euverard v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huttig v. City of Richmond HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Sun Oil Co. v. Board of Zoning AppealsLake County Court of Common Pleas · 1966
  3. Mintz v. Village of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API