Legal Opinion
Mintz v. Village of Pepper Pike
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 22, 1978No. 38256PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPryatel, J.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment which decreed that “the present zoning of plaintiff’s property,” located in the Village of Pepper Pike, “which prohibits the building by plaintiff of an office building is declared unconstitutional as it has no relationship to public health, safety, morals or welfare.”
The parcel in question is located on Lander Road near the traffic circle close to the southernmost boundary of the Village of Pepper Pike.
Streets extend from Lander Circle like five spokes from the hub of a wheel. Lander Road extends both north and south of the circle. Chagrin…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hunter v. EricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cottonwood Farms v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Smythe v. Butler TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Perrico Property Systems v. City of IndependenceOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Negin v. Board of Building & Zoning Appeals of the City of MentorOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Perrico Property Systems v. City of IndependenceOhio Court of Appeals · 1994