Legal Opinion

Smith v. Peet

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 1, 1977No. A 76-01-01313, CA 6705PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the circuit court denying their motion for summary judgment and granting defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment.

The issue on appeal is whether ORS 411.710(1) requires general assistance to be granted by the Public Welfare Division (PWD) to employable but involuntarily unemployed persons who otherwise meet eligibility requirements.

ORS 411.710(1) provides:

"General assistance shall be granted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the division and on the basis of need, taking into account the income, resources and maintenance available to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mooney v. PickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Van Ripper v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Fairview Hospital & Training Center v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Wasco County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local No. 2752Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Duncan v. Law Enforcement CouncilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. WASCO CTY. v. Am. Fed. of S., Cty. & Mun. Emp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Rajneesh Foundation International v. Corporation CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API