Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Kelly

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1904No. 1,767PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Deer Lodge County; Welling Nap ton, Judge. ActioN by Dave Hogan against T. L. Kelly and another. From a, judgment for defendants, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. COMMISSIONER CALLAWAY

prepared the opinion for the court.

Defendants bad judgment below. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, wbieb was denied. From the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial, he has appealed.

It is stated in the amended complaint, in substance, that plaintiff is the owner and entitled to- the possession of certain frame building’s of the value of $¡800, situated on land belonging to the Northern Pacific Railway Company, in Deer Lodge county, and in which land neither jdaintiff nor defendant have any interest; that the buildings are not affixed or permanently…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Luby v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Sanford v. Gates, Townsend & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Armington v. StelleMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Riddell v. Peck-Williamson Heating & Ventilating Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Beasley v. San José Fruit-Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Poindexter & Orr Live Stock Co. v. Oregon Short Line RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hosch v. HoweMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Oscarson v. Grain Growers Assn., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Swan v. Le ClairMontana Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API