Legal Opinion
Perez v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1970No. Civ. 33958PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FILES, P. J.
On January 5, 1967, the Director of Employment sent a notice to petitioner informing him he was not eligible to receive benefits for specified periods. The notice of determination stated, among other things:
“Reason for decision:
“You state you failed to report at your local as required—since 11-20-6.
“Since you are a member of a Union that controls job dispatching—you *64are required to meet the Union requirements to be available for referrals for work.
“When you claimed benefits for the weeks involved you stated you looked for work—which means you reported to your Union. You…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Gibson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Faulkner v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Flores v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Hicks v. SheffieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Amaro v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.