Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Sheffield
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1972No. Civ. 28828PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THE COURT.
Appellant filed an application for unemployment insurance benefits and was declared ineligible for such benefits because he had been discharged by his employer for misconduct. Appellant failed to file an appeal within 10 days after mailing or service of notice of determina tion, as required by section 1328 of the Unemployment Insurance Code. A hearing before a referee was held on the sole issue of good cause to file a late appeal. The referee concluded that appellant, who was represented by counsel, failed to show good cause. The appeals board affirmed the referee’s decision…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- California Department of Human Resources Development v. JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Perez v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Fermin v. Department of EmploymentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gibson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Faulkner v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Flores v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Amaro v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- County of Santa Clara v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.