Lemoine v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The petitioner, Kenneth F. Lemoine, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly found that his trial counsel and appellate counsel provided effective assistance. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the petitioner’s appeal. In June, 1992, a jury convicted the petitioner of sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (1) (B), risk of injury…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Toccaline v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Alexander v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- WILLIAM C. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011