Kornick v. Hahn

In this case a judgment was rendered in the court below,'and, afterwards, upon a motion Med during the same term, said judgment was set aside and vacated for reasons wfii'ch the trial court found to be sufficient.

It is urged in this court that there was no good and sufficient reason for setting aside the judgment, and that the trial court abused its discretion in so setting aside the judgment.

There is a marked difference between the power of the court over its judgments during the term at which they were entered, and its power over its judgments when its action is invoked by an application…