Legal Opinion

Higinbotham v. Atwater

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error : Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the CourtDunlap, P. J.

Plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff in the municipal court, secured a default judgment in an action brought upon a promissory note. This judgment was obtained in the January term; to be exact, it was obtained on February 3, 1919, a day of said term. On the next day, being also a day in said term, the defendant filed a motion to vacate the judgment, and an affidavit in support thereof; and upon February 15th, being also a day in said term, the court granted the motion and set aside the judgment.

To this action of the court the plaintiff excepted and filed his petition in error in this court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. DeitschOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  2. City of Cincinnati v. ArchiableOhio Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Kornick v. HahnOhio Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. TeachnorOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. All City Home Improvement Co. v. MurrayOhio Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API