Legal Opinion

State v. Hornsby

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1993PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

The State has appealed from a judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals reversing and dismissing, on the basis of the “physical facts rule,” the convictions of Keith Hornsby, Defendant-Appellee, for vehicular homicide and reckless driving. We granted the State’s Rule 11 application to decide whether the “physical facts rule” is applicable to a criminal case and, if so, whether it should have been applied to the facts presented here. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the physical facts rule is applicable to criminal cases but that the Court of Criminal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. SheffieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Byrge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  5. United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. RadleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. State of Tennessee v. Marcus PopeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State of Tennessee v. James Edward Farrar, Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  5. State v. BoldenTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API