Legal Opinion

State v. Bolden

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1998PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, C.J.

We granted this appeal to determine two issues: first, whether a co-defendant’s testimony pursuant to a plea agreement with the prosecution violated the defendant’s rights to due process of law and a fair trial under the United States and Tennessee Constitutions; and second, whether the trial court erred in charging the jury to consider the lesser included offense of second degree murder over the defendant’s objection.

In affirming the defendant’s conviction for second degree murder, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that the co-defendant’s testimony did not violate the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. ElyTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. State v. LangfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 2010

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API