Legal Opinion
Stachowski v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint *1005dismissed. Memorandum: In this action pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, plaintiffs claim for noise-induced occupational hearing loss accrued in May of 1986 when plaintiffs hearing problem first manifested itself and he suspected that his employment was a cause (see, United States v Kubrick, 444 US 111, 120-123; Urie v Thompson, 337 US 163, 169-170; Fries v Chicago & Northwestern Transp. Co., 909 F2d 1092, 1095; Lechowicz v Consolidated Rail Corp., 190 AD2d 998 [decided herewith]; cf., Guiher v…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lechowicz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Guiher v. South Buffalo Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pompa v. Burroughs Wellcome Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Briggs v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Lechowicz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Guiher v. South Buffalo Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993