Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs were employed as railroad workers by defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) or its predecessors, and retired with over 30 years of service to Conrail. Following retirement each plaintiff commenced an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA; 45 USC §§ 51-60) seeking damages for permanent sensorineural hearing loss and other personal injuries allegedly sustained as the result of his long-term exposure to harmful levels of noise and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. GTF Marketing, Inc. v. Colonial Aluminum Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Billman v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. McCoy v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Courtney v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1989
  5. Stokes v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Villager Construction, Inc. v. J. Kozel & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Welch v. Prevost Landowners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Barilla v. Meredith Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Dineen v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Joseph E. G. v. East Irondequoit Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API