Legal Opinion
Lechowicz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff was employed as a railroad worker by defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), or its predecessors, from December 28, 1946 until his retirement effective October 1, 1986. On October 3, 1989, he commenced this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA; 45 USC §§ 51-60) seeking monetary damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained, including permanent sensorineural hearing loss, as a result of his exposure to excessive levels of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Guiher v. South Buffalo Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Stachowski v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- Briggs v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Guiher v. South Buffalo Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Stachowski v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Miller v. Amerada Hess Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Pagano v. Long Island Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.