Legal Opinion

State v. Fabbri

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1917No. 14135PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered March 17, 1917, upon a trial and conviction of violating the state-wide prohibition law.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendant, Fabbri, was charged with the offense of manufacturing intoxicating liquor in violation of the act passed by direct vote of the people at the general *208election of 1914. Trial in the superior court without a jury resulted in judgment of conviction against him and that he pay a fine of fifty dollars, from which he has appealed to this court.

The facts are not in controversy, they having been admitted upon the trial. They may be briefly stated as follows: Appellant, having procured a quantity of grapes; took them to his home in Tacoma, where there resided only himself and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. In re CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Sargent v. American Bank & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. F. W. Cook Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bayha v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Thornbury v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. HosmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Fox v. GroffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API