Nollette v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*343OPINION
By the Court,
Becker, J.:
Appellant James L. Nollette claims his guilty plea was constitutionally infirm and his counsel was ineffective because he was not advised that, as a result of his conviction: (1) he would be required to register as a sex offender; and (2) he could lose his professional licenses. We hold that the requirement to register as a sex offender and the potential loss of a professional license are collateral consequences of a guilty plea, and as such, the failure to advise Nollette of these consequences does not invalidate the guilty plea or constitute ineffective…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kirksey v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ward v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Mitschke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Molina v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- The American Civil Liberties U v. Catherine MastoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Commonwealth v. LeidigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.