Legal Opinion

Sadler Ex Rel. Sadler v. Purser

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 18, 1971No. 712SC450PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The title to this action would indicate that the infant plaintiff appears by his next friend, which would be in accord with the practice which formerly prevailed in this State. 1 McIntosh, N. C. Practice and Procedure, 2nd Ed., § 690, p. 375. This practice has been changed by our new Rules of Civil Procedure, which now provide that in actions or special proceedings when any of the parties plaintiff are infants or incompetent persons, they must appear by general or testamentary guardian, if they have any within the State, or by duly appointed guardian ad litem. Rule 17 (b) of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Thompson v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. MattoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Welch Ex Rel. Johnson v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Champion v. WallerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Baby Boy ScearceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. City of Winston-Salem v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Elkins v. California Highway PatrolDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Lewis v. BrumblesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API