Legal Opinion

City of Winston-Salem v. Rice

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 25, 1972No. 7221DC655PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the trial judge erred in entering judgment for defendant notwithstanding the jury verdict for plaintiff on the ground that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. As to this contention we agree with plaintiff.

It is established that a motion for a directed verdict or judgment n.o.v. presents substantially the same question as that presented by a motion for nonsuit under former G.S. 1-183. Kelly v. International Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971); Sadler v. Purser, 12 N.C. App. 206, 182 S.E. 2d 850 (1971). Therefore, the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Torres v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. Fire Insurance Salvage CorpsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Lieb v. MayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. GLEN FOREST CORPORATION v. BenschCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Burlington v. StaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Myers v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Sharp v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. City of Winston-Salem v. RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API