Van Ostrand v. National Life Assurance Co. of Canada
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichard F. Kuhnen, J.
This is a motion by defendants for summary judgment in an action commenced by Mary Van Ostrand against the National Life Assurance Company of Canada and her former employer First National Bank and Trust Company of Ithaca.
While plaintiff was employed by First National, the bank carried a group life insurance policy for its employees. In January of 1972 a new feature of the plan was introduced which permitted employees to purchase insurance on the life of certain of their dependents, including spouses. Plaintiff purchased a policy on her husband’s life and paid the premiums by a payroll…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Corrigan v. . Bobbs-Merrill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Seavers v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Lecker v. General American Life Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- McGinnis v. Bankers Life Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Blue Cross of Northeastern New York, Inc. v. AyotteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Robert Clark, Jr. v. Union Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Dawes Mining Co. v. CallahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Morris v. Travelers Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Serradell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Dawes Mining Co. v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.