In re the Estate of Roessler
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The opposition of the respondents to the confirmation of the report of the learned referee, Oscar A. Lewis, Esq., *307exhibits a misconception respecting practice in Surrogates’ Courts which requires a word of comment for purposes of preliminary clarification. Each of the four objections interposed is “ to the referee’s finding and conclusion ” in respect of a stated point.
Unlike the practice in courts of general jurisdiction, the reports of referees in the Surrogates’ Courts have never been required to contain either findings of fact or conclusions of law. (Matter of Carpenter, 178…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- People Ex Rel. Commissioners of Public Charities & Correction v. CullenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Garlock v. GarlockNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Manufacturers Trust Co. v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Swanton v. CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Estate of BarcNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- Fox v. FoxNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Gimbel Bros. v. SteinmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
- In re the Estate of WagnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- Fernandez v. FernandezNew York City Family Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.