Legal Opinion
Garlock v. Garlock
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 3, 1939PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Crane, Ch. J.
The parties to this action are husband and wife, living in Palmyra, New York. Without any thought or idea of separation they entered into the following agreement:
“ This Agreement made and entered into this 2nd day of April, 1935, by and between Olin J. Garlock/of Palmyra, New York, party of the first part, and Pauline Harvey Garlock, of Palmyra, New York, party of. the second part,
“ Whereas, party of the first part and party of the second part are husband and wife, and reside together as such in the village of Palmyra, New York,
“ Witnesseth:
“ That for and in consideration of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Winter v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Tirrell v. . TirrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Keller v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon v. Lewis S. RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Belcher v. BelcherSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Haas v. HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Calvin Anthony Brissett v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, and Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Connolly v. ConnollySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.