Legal Opinion

Buckentin v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1994No. 93-556PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

This is an appeal from a Workers’ Compensation Court decision denying Buckentin’s Workers’ Compensation claim because he did not notify his employer of the injury within 30 days as required by § 39-71-603, MCA. We affirm.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the claimant, Gregory Buckentin (Buckentin) failed to report his injury to his employer, Bost Construction, within 30 days after the occurrence of the accident as required by § 39-71-603, MCA.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On December 1, 1992, Buckentin was unloading sheetrock for his employer, Bost Construction, when he injured his back. Buckentin…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith-Carter v. Amoco Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Plainbull v. Transamerica InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Reil v. Billings Processors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Bogle v. Ownerrent Rent to OwnMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bodily v. John Jump Trucking, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Caekaert v. State Compensation Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Strickland v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Larson v. Barry Smith Logging, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Champion International Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API