Legal Opinion

Strickland v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1995No. 94-534PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

The appellant, Janet Strickland, filed a petition in the Workers’ Compensation Court for the State of Montana, in which she sought compensation from the State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund for injuries she sustained in a two-car accident. The court denied Strickland’s claim on the basis that, at the time of the accident, she was not acting in the course and scope of her employment. Strickland appeals from the judgment which denied her petition. We affirm the Workers’ Compensation Court.

Strickland raises the following issues:

1. Was there substantial evidence to support the Workers’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steffes v. 93 Leasing Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Stordalen v. Ricci's Food FarmMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Wunderlich v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Smith v. United Parcel ServiceMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Buckentin v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. South v. Transportation InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Heath v. Montana Municipal Insurance AuthorityMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Carrillo v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bevan v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Romans v. Liberty Ins.Montana Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API