Legal Opinion

Hollister v. Forsythe

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1995No. 94-469PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

This is an appeal from the July 26, 1994, order of the Montana Sixteenth Judicial District Court dismissing plaintiff Hollister’s claims on the basis that her claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.

Issue

Under Montana’s “renewal” statute, § 27-2-407, MCA, is the statute of limitations tolled for one year from the date a claim is terminated at the trial court level or is it tolled for one year from the date the claim is terminated at the appeal court level?

Background

Marilyn Hollister worked as a secretary in the Rosebud County Attorney’s Office until…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Marilyn Hollister v. John Forsythe, a Public Officer Rosebud County, a Montana Political SubdivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Dinerman v. SuttonNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. McGregor v. MadsenMontana Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Maloney v. Home and Investment Center, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. DuBrayMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Augustine v. SimonsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gray v. Simonson Farmers Ins. ExcMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Engel v. GamppMontana Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API