Legal Opinion
Cua v. Morrison
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 29, 1993No. 29A05-9212-CV-456PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Rosita L. Cua (“Cua”) and Stephen M. Paterson (“Paterson”) jointly submit this permissive interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s Order requiring Cua, the plaintiff in a personal injury tort claim, to execute a letter authorizing defense counsel to conduct informal, ex parte interviews with her health-care providers.
Pursuant to Appellate Rule 4(B)(6), the trial court certified the issue to us as follows:
“Whether the Trial Court abused its discretion in entering an Order requiring plaintiff to sign a release allowing defense counsel to engage in ex parte communication with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Collins v. BairIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Billy Overstreet v. TRW Commercial Steering DivisionTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Hayworth v. Schilli Leasing, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Alsip v. Johnson City Medical CenterTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Penn Central Corp. v. BuchananIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Sercon Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.