Legal Opinion

Miller v. Hockley

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1936No. 3886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit instituted by the appellees, herein referred to as the plaintiffs, against the appellant, herein referred to as the defendant, in the District Court of the . United States for , the District of Maryland, in October, 1933, to recover on several promissory notes aggregating $628,125, with interest. The appellees had been appointed, and duly qualified, as receivers of the Davison Realty Company, a corporation, and the notes were payable to that corporation. By leave of court, the receivers were authorized to institute suit against the defendant on said…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Burnes v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Brown v. SpoffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Martin v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Vanderford v. Farmers' & Mechanics' National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foreman v. Melrod Ex Rel. Krick of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. In Re Davison Chemical Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1936
  3. Saliba v. Arthur Fulmer Charlotte, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Venners v. GoldbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API