Legal Opinion
Norton v. Lilley
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 24, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
1. The first exception is to the refusal of the judge * to continue the case when the demurrer came on for argument. The plaintiff’s motion to continue was based on the ground that the judge was disqualified. The alleged facts on which the plaintiff contended that he was disqualified were as follows: The judge in question and all other judges of the Superior Court and of all other courts of the Commonwealth are members of the bar and bar associations (the two are used as convertible terms in the motion). And the bar and bar associations form a “perfect labor union or law trust” which “…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kennedy v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Putney v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- McCusker v. GeigerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- McCallum v. LambieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Johnson v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Harmon v. WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Fourth National Bank v. MeadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Enga v. SparksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Channell v. Judge of Central District Court of Northern EssexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.