Legal Opinion

Channell v. Judge of Central District Court of Northern Essex

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 11, 1912PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus. At the hearing before the single justice,* the petition was dismissed. From this decree the petitioner has appealed. The statute does not allow an appeal from a decision of a justice of this court in. a proceeding at law, that procedure being confined to decisions of the Superior Court. R. L. c. 173, § 96 as amended by St. 1906, c. 342, § 2, and St. 1910, c. 555, § 4. Cowley v. Train, 124 Mass. 226. Attorney General v. Oliver, 175 Mass. 163. Brockton v. County Commissioners, 183 Mass. 42. Norton v. Lilley, 210 Mass. 214, 218. The only way to bring…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crocker v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Norton v. LilleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Cowley v. TrainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  4. Attorney General v. OliverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Inhabitants of Brockton v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First District Court of Eastern MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Mengel v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Martell v. MoffattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Chambers's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. In re HolbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API