Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crescent Metal Products, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1980No. 79-1074PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

IC-5-08.03(A)(l) provides that “[e]very power press in use shall be constructed, or shall be guarded to prevent the hands or fingers of the operator from entering the danger zone during the operating cycle.” IC-5-08.03(G) provides that “[t]he requirements of IC-5-08.03(A) to IC-5-08.03(F), inclusive, shall be applicable to power press brakes when used for other then bending or breaking.” Appellant does not dispute the finding of the commission that the press brake was not constructed or guarded to meet the requirements of IC-5-08.03(A) and (G). Rather, it alleges that any obligations imposed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. City Iron Works, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HCMC, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. In Re Waste Technologies IndustriesOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API