State ex rel. City Iron Works, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Beown, J.
The issue presented by this cause is whether mandamus should lie to direct the Industrial Commission to vacate its specific safety requirement violation award order issued in 1973.
It is established law that mandamus will not issue to vacate an order of the Industrial Commission unless that order constitutes an abuse of discretion. State, ex rel. Ruggles, v. Stebbins (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 228, 229; State, ex rel. Mees, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 128, 130; State, ex rel. Wilms, v. Blake (1945), 144 Ohio St. 2d 619, 622.1 Reviewing courts will find such an abuse of discretion only…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. Mees v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. Ruggles v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. FrantzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Taber v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State ex rel. 31, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Conover v. Lake County Metro Parks SystemOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State ex rel. Crescent Metal Products, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.