Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Di Sandro

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1930No. Appeal 331, 332PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The judgments from which we have these appeals were entered upon verdicts recovered in behalf of the minor plaintiff as damages for personal injuries suffered by him through the explosion of dynamite caps in a bonfire and by his father for consequent medical expenses. The assignments allege error in the refusal of defendant’s, point' for binding instructions, the subsequent denial of his motion for judgment n. o. v. and the entering of judgments upon the verdicts. The matter here involved, therefore, is whether the trial jndge was justified in submitting to the jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sowers v. McManusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Rafferty v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Cain v. Booth & Flinn, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Loughlin v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Carpenter v. Miller & SonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reichvalder v. Borough of TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Chambers v. Ellis, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API