In re Buspirone Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The plaintiffs in these consolidated antitrust eases have made two motions: (1) for a ruling that defendant Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (“Bristol-Myers”) has already waived its attorney-client privilege with respect to certain matters because it placed those matters “at issue” in this litigation and (2) to compel Bristol-Myers to elect whether it intends to assert “good faith” or “reliance on counsel” defenses to the claims asserted in the complaints.1 For the reasons stated *518below, the first motion is denied and the second motion is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Paddington Partners v. Jean-Louis Bouchard, Herbert A. Denton, Econocom Finance Nv Econocom International N v. Jeffries & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Mitchell v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- CSX Corp. v. Children's Investment Fund Management (UK) LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Davidson v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Ramada Franchise Systems, Inc. v. BoychukDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Stovall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Beery v. Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.