Legal Opinion
Westerland v. Argonaut Grill
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1936No. 26065. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
William H. Westerland brought suit against The Argonaut Grill, a corporation,'to recover damages on account of personal injuries alleged to have been sustained while patronizing the grill. In that suit, he alleged that, without justification, he had been assaulted and severely beaten by one Reed, who at that time was engaged in the course of his employment as headwaiter and night manager of the grill. The trial of the case resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. A judgment on the verdict was affirmed on ap peal. Westerland v. Argonaut Grill, 185 Wash. 411, 55 P. (2d) 819.
The judgment not…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Georgia Cas. Co. v. Alden MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
- Sontag v. GalerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Commonwealth Casualty Co. v. HeadersOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
- Fox Wisconsin Corp. v. Century Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Floralbell Amusement Corp. v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Huntington Cab Co. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. DottsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Langford Electric Co. v. Employees Mutual Indemnity Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Floralbell Amusement Corp. v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.